🔗 Share this article

Russia's monetary authority has declared it is seeking damages amounting to $230 billion from the financial institution Euroclear. This move constitutes a direct response by the Kremlin against plans to use frozen Russian state assets to support Ukraine.

The Substantial Demand

Based on accounts in Russian state media, the central bank initiated a lawsuit last week for roughly 18 trillion roubles. This sum corresponds to the aforementioned $230 billion claim.

EU leaders are set to determine in the coming days regarding a proposal to use approximately €210 billion in frozen Russian state funds. The proposal entails providing Ukraine with a substantial loan to fund its defence and economic needs.

The vast majority of these funds, amounting to €185 billion, are held at the Euroclear depository in Brussels. Euroclear serves as the primary custodian for the Kremlin's immobilised financial reserves.

A Clash Over Legality

European Union officials have argued that their proposal is legally sound. They argue rests on the principle that title of the sovereign wealth still belongs to Russia, even though it was immobilized in EU countries following the full-scale military offensive of Ukraine.

The Russian government, in contrast, has called any utilization of the funds as illegal appropriation. It has warned of retaliatory measures, such as confiscating European corporate holdings within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, a figure who has assumed a prominent role in diplomatic talks, stated on X that Russia "will win in court" and regain its assets. He added that the European Union, the common currency, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the plan.

Wider Implications

In comments interpreted as an attempt to create division between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev characterized the proposal as "a severe assault on property rights and the international reserves system established by the United States."

Euroclear declined to provide a statement on the latest legal action. The institution has previously stated it is contending with over 100 lawsuits in Russian courts.

Legal Hurdles Ahead

Although judges in European nations are unlikely to enforce judgments from Russian tribunals, experts anticipate Moscow to pursue implementation in nations with closer ties to the Kremlin.

"Russian monetary authorities may attempt to implement a Russian legal ruling against Euroclear in countries such as China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other sympathetic nations, provided that such holdings can be located," commented a lawyer from an NSP law firm.

EU Countermeasures

EU officials said they are working on steps to deter other countries from assisting any Russian legal action against European entities. They are also designing safeguards to shield EU member states with investments in Russia from what they call "unlawful expropriation."

The Proposed Loan Mechanism

Under the complex scheme, the EU would issue an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the proceeds generated from the immobilized assets at Euroclear. Importantly, Russia's legal claim on the principal funds would remain untouched.

Kyiv would solely be required to repay the loan in the event that Russia agreed to pay compensation for the vast damage caused during the ongoing conflict.

Other Funding Ideas

Belgium, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has asked the EU to consider an alternative approach for funding Ukraine. This entails common EU borrowing to secure a loan, backed by unused funds within the European budget.

This alternative move, nevertheless, demands unanimity among all 27 EU countries. Hungary's government, considered aligned with the Kremlin, has previously signaled its objection.

Speaking on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, a senior official, said the reparations loan as "the most credible solution" for aiding Ukraine. "This mechanism is secured against the Russian frozen assets, meaning it is not drawn from our taxpayers' money, which is also important," she remarked. "Furthermore, it delivers a clear signal that if you do all this damage to another country, you have to pay for the reparations."